Sanctuary Integrated Monitoring Network
Monitoring Project

Potential Impacts of the Monterey Accelerated Research System (MARS) Cable on the Seabed and Benthic Faunal Assemblages

Principal Investigator(s)

  • Jim Barry
    Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
  • Linda Kuhnz
    Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute


  • National Science Foundation
  • Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
Start Date: October 10, 2003

The Monterey Accelerated Research System (MARS) includes an undersea cable 51 km in length that connects the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI) to a science ‘node’ at a depth of 891 m on the continental slope just outside Monterey Bay, California (Figure 1). MARS was installed in March 2007, and the cable provides power and high data bandwidth for science instruments connected to the node via additional, thin ‘extension’ cables deployed on the seabed by remotely operated vehicles (ROVs). MARS is one of a few cabled ocean-observing systems that enable continuous, long-term science capabilities for ocean science with real-time communication, control, and data capture from offshore subsea sensor systems.

The cable connecting MARS to MBARI does not lay on top of the sea floor where it could be snagged by other human activities. Instead, the cable was buried in a thin trench, protecting it from becoming a hazard or becoming damaged by fishing activities. Digging the trench required an environmental impact report to determine the impact of both the trench and the presence of the cable on benthic and demersal biota.

Prior to MARS cable installation, an environmental impact report was prepared, including characterization of seabed biological communities along the cable route and initial sampling for future environmental impact assessment (2004). This survey included characterization of the megafaunal animals (organisms identifiable in video recordings) and macrofaunal organisms (worms, crustaceans, etc., captured from sieved sediment samples) along the cable route. Subsequent to MARS cable installation, a Post-Lay Inspection and Burial (PLIB) survey of the entire route was conducted (March 16 to March 22, 2007 and June 7, 2007) and environmental impact assessments are required at ~18 month to 5-year intervals, including observations of the condition of the cable and potential effects on biological communities. This monitoring project presents data from environmental impact assessment surveys performed prior to cable installation, in 2007-2008 following cable installation, and again in 2010.

Summary to Date

Inspection of the MARS cable in 2010 (Fig. 2), coupled with a sampling program to evaluate changes in geological and biological conditions on local and regional scales with respect to the installation of the cable indicate little detectable influence of the cable. The most conspicuous evidence of cable installation is the cable exposed on the seabed for a short distance where it could not be buried (Fig. 3). Analyses of the geological and biological sampling program indicate the following:

Monitoring Trends

  • Over most of its length, the cable remains buried, with little evidence of change since installation (Fig. 4).
  • Changes in mean grain size were undetectable in relation to the MARS cable (Fig. 5).
    The percent organic carbon content of sediments increased near the MARS cable at some locations, possibly due to natural variation or the effects of the cable or both (Fig. 6).
  • Local variation in benthic megafaunal communities (Fig. 7A-C) within 50-100 m of the MARS cable is minor or undetectable. The abundances of most animals observed did not differ between the area over the cable route and 50 m away. Longnose skates (Raja rhina) were significantly more abundant in one area where the MARS cable is suspended over topography (~300 m depth) in 2008. These animals may have responded to weak electromagnetic fields generated by the cable. During 2010, when the cable was energized, the numbers of R. rhina were near background levels near and distant from the cable.
  • The MARS cable has little effect on the distribution and abundance of macrofaunal (Fig. 7D-F) and megafaunal assemblages on a regional scale (e.g. kilometers). Megafauna and macrofauna compared before and after cable installation among 3 control stations and 1 cable station at each of 3 depth zones (Shelf - <200 m, Neck – 200-500 m, Slope - >500 m) indicated relatively few potential changes in benthic biological patterns due to the MARS cable (Fig. 8). Natural spatial and temporal variation in the abundance and distribution of benthic macrofauna and megafauna appears to be greater than any detectable effects of the MARS cable.


The sampling program was designed to: • Observe the condition of the cable or cable trench along the cable route (51 km), • Assess the potential impacts of the MARS cable on geological characteristics and biological assemblages on a local scale (0-100 m from the cable) and a regional scale (km), using remotely operated vehicle (ROV) video transects and sediment samples.

The major conclusion of the study is that the MARS cable has had little detectable impact on seabed geomorphology, sediment conditions, or biological assemblages.

Study Parameters

  • Behavior
  • Range/Biogeography
  • Substrate characterization
  • Salinity
  • Temperature
  • Density
  • Distribution
  • Abundance
  • Disturbance
  • Diversity
  • Habitat
  • Habitat association

Study Methods

Cable position and condition assessed by ROV surveys

Video Transects used to estimate densities of seabed organisms and objects

Sediment core sampling using ROV manipulator arms and pushcores

Figures and Images

Image not available at this time.
/public/regional_images/monitoring_projects/100391_fig1.jpgImage not available at this time.
/public/regional_images/monitoring_projects/100391_fig2.jpgImage not available at this time.
/public/regional_images/monitoring_projects/100391_fig3.jpgImage not available at this time.
/public/regional_images/monitoring_projects/100391_fig4.jpgImage not available at this time.
/public/regional_images/monitoring_projects/100391_fig5.jpgImage not available at this time.
/public/regional_images/monitoring_projects/100391_fig6.jpgImage not available at this time.
/public/regional_images/monitoring_projects/100391_fig7.jpgImage not available at this time.